Helical Internal Ring Gear Design
Exact helical internal (ring) gear geometry from the normal module or normal diametral pitch and the helix angle: teeth on the inside, cut by a helical shaper cutter of the same hand, measured between balls with an inside micrometer. The sheet back-solves the as-built tooth from the measurement and exports a true twisted STEP AP203 annulus, the transverse DXF, or an STL.
Updated: 7/6/2026
The live solid: drag to orbit. Every number, the exact profile and the exports follow below.
| Normal diametral pitch Pnd | 8.0000 1/in |
| Teeth z · normal pressure angle αn | 72 · 20.00° |
| Helix angle β · hand at the pitch cylinder · the mating pinion is the SAME hand (internal pair) | 15.000° · right hand |
| Base helix angle βb tan βb = tan β · cos αt | 14.076° |
| Transverse DP · pressure angle αt the plane the profile below lives in | 7.7274 1/in · 20.647° |
| Profile shift xn +x thickens the ring tooth | 0.0000 |
| Pitch diameter d z·mn/cos β | 9.31749 in |
| Base diameter db | 8.71904 in |
| Minor Ø (tooth tips, the bore) | 9.06749 in |
| Major Ø (root) | 9.62999 in |
| Form diameter (true SAP / TIF) involute → fillet hand-off (outward) | 9.57230 in |
| Rim OD (blank) backup ratio mB = 1.38 | 10.40644 in |
| Lead L one full wrap of the helix | 109.24364 in |
| Axial pitch px | 1.51727 in |
| Normal base pitch pbn base-pitch checker reading | 0.36902 in |
| Transverse circular / base pitch | 0.40655 in / 0.38044 in |
| Virtual (equivalent) teeth zv z / (cos²βb · cos β) | 79.23 |
| Overlap ratio εβ b · sin β / (π·mn) | 1.153 |
| Tooth thickness sn @ pitch normal plane · transverse st = 0.20328 in | 0.19635 in |
| Chordal thickness s̄ caliper in the normal plane (virtual ring) | 0.19634 in |
| Chordal depth h̄ caliper depth, set from the tip lands | 0.12403 in |
| Tip-land thickness sa (transverse) at the minor Ø | 0.11574 in |
| Roll angles tip / pitch / form transverse · note the reversed order on internals | 16.36° / 21.59° / 25.96° |
| Shaper cutter in play OD 4.32420 in · αw = 20.65° (transverse) | 31 T helical auto · reach 1.207·mt · fresh grind |
Scroll to zoom, drag to pan. Transverse section (the plane ⊥ the axis) · 72 exact internal teeth of the mt = 0.12941 in transverse involute, true shaper-cutter trochoid root fillets (a 31-tooth helical cutter), sampled at 0.01 thou·10⁻³ chordal tolerance · 19,872 points. The helix twists this section along the axis; the table above carries the normal-plane numbers.
Watertight twisted ring solid: 450,432 triangles, 225,216 welded vertices · volume 29.233 in³ · drag to orbit. The STL button exports exactly this mesh.
I · Two planes, one ring tooth. A helical ring tooth is a spur ring tooth in the plane perpendicular to itself (the normal plane, where the cutter, the caliper and the ball live) wound onto a helix of angle β at the pitch cylinder. The plane of rotation (transverse) sees everything stretched by the wrap: mt = mn/cos β, tan αt = tan αn/cos β, d = z·mn/cos β, while radial heights keep NORMAL proportions (addendum mn(ha*+xn) inward, dedendum mn(hf*-xn) outward). The shift and thinning map as xt = xncos β and Δst = Δsn/cos β. On the base cylinder the helix flattens to tan βb = tan β·cos αt, the angle that runs the metrology below. The lead is L = πd/tan β; one axial pitch is px = π·mn/sin β. One internal-specific bonus falls straight out: the tips of a ring tooth must stay OUTSIDE the base circle for an involute to exist there, z ≥ 2(ha*+x)t/(1-cos αt) in the transverse plane, and since αt grows with β while the coefficients shrink by cos β, the classic ≈34-tooth floor of 20° full-depth spur rings falls fast with helix.
II · The flank, inside out. In the transverse plane the working flank is the same involute of the base circle rb = r cos αt, used on its CONCAVE side. Thickness opens OUTWARD: ψ(r) = s/d - inv αt + inv φr, cos φr = rb/r, so the tooth is thinnest at the tips (the minor Ø, the pre-machined bore) and thickest at the root (the major Ø). The identical closed forms (and the identical certification) as the spur ring sheet, run at (mt, αt, xt).
III · The root, cut by a real cutter. The fillet is the envelope of the shaper cutter's tip-corner circle as the cutter (an external gear of zc teeth, HELICAL, same hand and helix as the ring) rolls INSIDE the ring on the true generation circles, all of it in the transverse plane where shaping kinematics live. Conjugacy fixes everything: the ring's thickness sets the working pressure angle through inv αw = inv αt + 2(x - xc)t tan αt/(z - zc), the base-circle identity a·cos αw = rb - rb,c sets the feed depth, and the cutter's tip reach is whatever produces the specified root at that depth. The generated point obeys the law of gearing, its normal passes through the rolling pitch point, so the envelope is explicit, the root tangency is closed-form, and the fillet-involute hand-off happens at the roll instant where the contact crosses the cutter's own flank-to-corner blend. Change the cutter tooth count and the fillet changes with it.
IV · Between balls, not pins. Two balls in opposite spaces, an inside mic between them. A cylindrical pin in a helical space lies along the helix and touches off-plane; a ball contacts both flanks in one transverse section. On the base-tangent plane the concave flank unrolls to a straight line inclined at βb, and the ball clears it by half the ball measured in that plane, which inserts the base helix into the internal closure in two places: inv φM = inv αt + π/z - st/d - dball/(db·cos βb), center circle rM = rb/cos φM, M = 2rM - dball (even z; odd z gets the cos 90°/z correction), contact at tan-length rbtan φM + (dball/2)cos βb. Note the internal signs: a BIGGER ball sits DEEPER and reads SMALLER. The engine does not take the closure on faith: the test suite builds the exact internal involute helicoid point-by-point and finds the true 3-D tangency of the ball by brute force, the closed form matches to microns on even and odd counts, shifted and thinned. Run backwards, a measured M recovers xn (or Δsn), which is exactly how this sheet adjusts the profile. Everything reduces to the spur ring's between-pins equations at β = 0.
V · The twisted annulus, certified. The 3-D solid is the certified transverse section swept along the helix: each slice is the exact section rotated by (twist/width)·z, no re-approximation, with slice count set by your chord tolerance, and the mesh verified watertight (every directed edge used exactly twice) with volume matching the cap-area × width identity (Cavalieri, a twist does not change volume) and every rim vertex exactly on the rim cylinder (the blank does not twist). The STEP flanks are tensor-product B-spline surfaces built the same way: the u-direction carries the certified 2-D profile spline, the v-direction interpolates each control point's own helix track with exact helix end-tangents (see the method note on the helical sheet for what that is worth), so every constant-v section of the surface is the bottom section rotated and lifted, a property the test suite re-audits by parsing the emitted file and evaluating the surfaces against R(θv)·S(u,0) + Wv·ẑ. Tip lands live on one true minor CYLINDRICAL_SURFACE, the rim is two straight cylinder halves, and the edge graph is checked closed on the emitted bytes. All geometry is closed-form double precision underneath, inheriting the gear engine's three-way certification.
Notes on using the results
- Same hand, this one. External helical pairs on parallel shafts mesh right against left, but an INTERNAL pair meshes with the same hand: a right-hand pinion runs in a right-hand ring at the same β. That is the standard planetary layout (sun RH, planets LH, ring LH, or the mirror of it). The Hand selector drives the 3-D solid and the STEP so the part you export is the part you meant.
- Thrust is still the price of quiet. The helix turns part of the tooth force axial: Fa = Ft·tan β at the pitch cylinder. In a planetary set the ring's thrust reacts through its housing bolts or spline; account for it, or cancel it with a double-helical ring.
- The minor Ø is a bore, the major Ø is the cut. The blank is bored to the minor diameter first, the tooth tips are remnants of that surface, and the shaper cuts the spaces outward to the major diameter. That is why thinning Δsn moves the major Ø and every measurement while the minor Ø stays put, and why this sheet honors a typed minor/major exactly.
- Backup ratio. The rim behind the root carries the mesh: rim wall / whole depth below ≈1.2 and the ring breathes under load and distorts in the chuck. The sheet defaults the blank OD to a ratio of ≈1.33 and warns when you go thin.
- Face width earns the overlap. The smooth-running benefit comes from the overlap ratio εβ = b·sin β/(π·mn): at εβ ≥ 1 at least one full tooth is always entering as another leaves. The sheet reads it out and flags a face too narrow to reach 1.
- Backlash & tolerances. The Thinning Δsn field carries the allowance separately from the design shift, and the between-balls measurement can be attributed to either (xn for an unknown ring, Δsn for a known print).
- Mating checks live on the pair. Involute interference with the pinion, trochoid interference, and the radial-assembly limit are properties of the PAIR, not this single ring, and belong to the mating sheet planned next. The cutter-side equivalents ARE checked here, because the cutter is part of this ring's definition.
References & further reading
- tec-science · Profile shift, the no-undercut relation this sheet applies in its internal, cutter-true form.
- Machinery's Handbook · Gearing section: internal gears, helical gear formulas (normal/transverse), measurement between wires and over balls.
- KHK · Gear Technical Reference, internal gear geometry, helical calculations, interference limits, planetary practice.
- Colbourne, The Geometry of Involute Gears, the signed-tooth-number convention and internal gearing theory.
- Litvin & Fuentes, Gear Geometry and Applied Theory, screw involute surfaces, generation, envelopes and shaper-cut fillets.
- Wikipedia · Gear shaper, how internal teeth are actually cut (the helical guide adds the twist).
Disclaimer
Recommendations on application design and material selection are based on available technical data and are offered as suggestions only. Each user should make their own tests to determine the suitability for their own particular use. Standards Applied LLC offers no express or implied warranties concerning the form, fit, or function of a product in any application.
Third-party trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used on this website for informational purposes only. No affiliation with, and no sponsorship or endorsement by, such third-party trademark owners is claimed or implied.