Internal Ring Gear Design
Exact internal (ring) gear geometry from module or diametral pitch — teeth on the inside, cut by a pinion-type shaper cutter, measured between pins with an inside micrometer. The sheet back-solves the as-built tooth from the measurement and exports a true STEP AP203 annulus, the DXF profile, or an STL.
Updated: 7/4/2026
The live solid — drag to orbit. Every number, the exact profile and the exports follow below.
| Diametral pitch | 8.0000 1/in |
| Teeth z · pressure angle | 72 · 20.00° |
| Profile shift x +x thickens the ring tooth | 0.0000 |
| Pitch diameter d | 9.00000 in |
| Base diameter db | 8.45723 in |
| Minor Ø (tooth tips — the bore) | 8.75000 in |
| Major Ø (root) | 9.31250 in |
| Form diameter (true SAP / TIF) involute → fillet hand-off (outward) | 9.25380 in |
| Rim OD (blank) backup ratio mB = 1.33 | 10.06250 in |
| Circular pitch p | 0.39270 in |
| Base pitch pb | 0.36902 in |
| Tooth thickness s @ pitch | 0.19635 in |
| Chordal thickness s̄ gear-tooth caliper | 0.19633 in |
| Chordal depth h̄ caliper depth, set from the tip lands | 0.12393 in |
| Tip-land thickness sa at the minor Ø | 0.11281 in |
| Roll angles tip / pitch / form note the reversed order on internals | 15.21° / 20.85° / 25.45° |
| Shaper cutter in play OD 4.31250 in · αw = 20.00° | 32 T auto · reach 1.250·m · fresh grind |
Scroll to zoom, drag to pan. 72 exact internal teeth — involute flanks from the base circle, true shaper-cutter trochoid root fillets (a 32-tooth cutter), sampled at 0.01 thou·10⁻³ chordal tolerance — 20,160 points.
Watertight ring solid: 57,600 triangles, 28,800 welded vertices · volume 15.756 in³ · drag to orbit. The STL button exports exactly this mesh.
I · The flank, inside out. A ring tooth's working flank is the same involute of the base circle rb = r cos α — used on its CONCAVE side. Thickness opens OUTWARD: ψ(r) = s/d − inv α + inv φr, cos φr = rb/r, so the tooth is thinnest at the tips (the minor Ø — the pre-machined bore) and thickest at the root (the major Ø). Because the involute only exists outside the base circle, a ring tip that dips inside it has no flank there: that is why full-depth 20° internals need roughly 34 teeth or more, and why this sheet refuses below the limit instead of drawing fiction.
II · The root, cut by a real cutter. The fillet is the envelope of the shaper cutter's tip-corner circle as the cutter (an external gear of zc teeth) rolls INSIDE the ring on the true generation circles. Conjugacy fixes everything: the ring's thickness sets the working pressure angle through inv αw = inv α + 2(x − xc) tan α/(z − zc), the base-circle identity a·cos αw = rb − rb,c sets the feed depth, and the cutter's tip reach is whatever produces the specified root at that depth. The generated point obeys the law of gearing — its normal passes through the rolling pitch point — so the envelope is explicit, the root tangency is closed-form, and the fillet–involute hand-off happens at the roll instant where the contact crosses the cutter's own flank-to-corner blend. Change the cutter tooth count and the fillet honestly changes with it.
III · Between pins. Two pins in opposite spaces, an inside mic between them. The closure mirrors the external case with the pin on the concave flank: inv φM = inv α + π/z − s/d − dp/db, center circle rM = rb/cos φM, M = 2 rM − dp (even z; odd z gets the cos 90°/z correction). Note the internal signs: a BIGGER pin sits DEEPER and reads SMALLER. Run backwards — measured M → φM → thickness s → shift — it recovers the as-cut ring, which is exactly how this sheet adjusts the profile. The engine cross-checks the closed form against a brute-force geometric pin-contact solve to ~10⁻⁷, flags pins that seat in the fillet, ride the tips, bottom in the root, or hide outside the bore where no mic can touch them.
IV · Accuracy. All geometry is closed-form in double precision; curves are emitted as full-precision polylines refined below your chordal tolerance (default m/10,000). The engine's ring suite verifies the involute by its defining property (every flank normal is tangent to the base circle — the string test, applied point-by-point to the emitted profile), proves the between-pins closed form against an independent geometric contact solve, checks the zero-backlash duality against a standard external pinion (0.25·m clearances at both ends), and confirms the annulus solid watertight with the volume matching the cap-area × width identity to 10⁻⁶. The STEP export is re-parsed and its edge graph checked closed (every edge used exactly twice, opposite senses).
Notes on using the results
- The minor Ø is a bore, the major Ø is the cut. The blank is bored to the minor diameter first — the tooth tips are remnants of that surface — and the shaper cuts the spaces outward to the major diameter. That is why thinning Δs moves the major Ø and every measurement while the minor Ø stays put, and why this sheet honors a typed minor/major exactly.
- Backup ratio. The rim behind the root carries the mesh: rim wall / whole depth below ≈1.2 and the ring breathes under load and distorts in the chuck. The sheet defaults the blank OD to a ratio of ≈1.33 and warns when you go thin.
- Shaper-cut roots are not rack-table roots. On shifted or thinned rings the cutter reach required to hit the rack-formula major Ø drifts from the standard 1.25·m — the dimensions table reports the reach in play, and extreme demands are flagged (or refused when the corner would trim the flank away). If a print's root disagrees with the formula, type it: the trochoid follows the print.
- Backlash & tolerances. The Thinning Δs field carries the allowance separately from the design shift, and the between-pins measurement can be attributed to either (x for an unknown ring, Δs for a known print).
- Mating checks live on the pair. Involute interference with the pinion, trochoid interference, and the radial-assembly limit (a pinion can only be dropped in radially when z2 − z1 is large enough — otherwise it goes in axially) are properties of the PAIR, not this single ring, and belong to the mating sheet planned next. The cutter-side equivalents ARE checked here, because the cutter is part of this ring's definition.
References & further reading
- tec-science — Profile shift — the x = 1 − z·sin²α/2 no-undercut relation this sheet applies in its cutter-true form.
- Machinery's Handbook — Gearing section: internal gears, measurement between pins/wires, profile-shift practice.
- KHK — Gear Technical Reference — internal gear geometry, interference limits, between-pin tables.
- Colbourne, The Geometry of Involute Gears — the signed-tooth-number convention and internal gearing theory.
- Litvin & Fuentes, Gear Geometry and Applied Theory — generation, envelopes and shaper-cut fillets.
- Wikipedia — Gear shaper — how internal teeth are actually cut.
Disclaimer
Recommendations on application design and material selection are based on available technical data and are offered as suggestions only. Each user should make their own tests to determine the suitability for their own particular use. Standards Applied LLC offers no express or implied warranties concerning the form, fit, or function of a product in any application.
Third-party trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used on this website for informational purposes only. No affiliation with, and no sponsorship or endorsement by, such third-party trademark owners is claimed or implied.